Method for interpolating a previous and subsequent image of an input image sequence

ABSTRACT

A method for interpolating a previous and subsequent image of an input image sequence, including: determining fidelity information for at least one motion vector that is descriptive for motion between a previous and subsequent image, wherein the fidelity information is descriptive for the level and accuracy of the motion, determining classification information for the at least one motion vector, wherein the classification information depends on the fidelity information, the classification information being descriptive for the motion type of the motion, and selecting an interpolation method in dependence of the determined classification information.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The invention relates to a method for interpolating a previous and subsequent image of an input image sequence. Further, the invention relates to a signal processing system, a computer program product, a computer readable storage medium and a signal processing means for interpolating a previous and subsequent image of an input image sequence.

BACKGROUND

It is generally desirable to improve the perceptual image quality of interpolated images produced by a motion compensation system. A typical motion compensation system consists of two major building blocks. The first block is the motion estimation process that produces a motion vector field, which describes the local displacement of image parts estimated from two images at distinct but usually adjacent points in time. The estimated motion vector information is then used by the interpolation process to displace those image parts in motion by a fractional amount τ that represents the intermediate temporal position of the image to be interpolated. FIG. 1 depicts this situation for a one-dimensional image containing a still background object BG and a moving foreground object FG. The displacement of the border between BG and FG from time n to time n+1 is given by the vector v. To properly interpolate an image at time n+τ, the vector v has to be scaled by factor τ to find the interpolated position of the border between BG and FG. The line a denotes the access position in the previous and next images at time index n and n+1 respectively, where the image parts at those positions are used in a filtering process to produce the interpolated image part at point p.

The interpolation process will however not reproduce the proper border between objects BG and FG if the estimated motion vector v, for some reason, does not reflect the actual motion of object FG. This situation is visualized in FIG. 2, where the motion estimation results in the wrong vector v′ instead of the correct vector v. As a consequence, the border between the two objects includes now a transition area between the access lines b and c, and the interpolation process will be based on a mix of foreground and background areas. In general, this constellation will result in the border area not being properly constructed and therefore decrease the perceptual quality of the interpolation result.

The reasons for the failure of the motion estimation process can be manifold. They are related to the principle of motion estimation itself or due to implementation related constraints. Prominent causes for failing motion estimation are:

-   -   When a foreground object depicted in an image sequence moves         over a background object, then parts of the background occluded         by the foreground in the previous image will be exposed in the         next image. Contrary, parts of the background image exposed in         the previous images might be occluded by the foreground object         when it moves over those parts. Most motion estimation processes         still try to estimate a motion vector for those occlusion and         exposure areas. This is however prone to error, because the         information used in the matching process is only present in         either the previous or the next image.     -   If the matching process has determined several candidates for         the displacement vector, all of them resulting in equally good         matches with respect to the matching criterion, the finally         assigned vector might be a random selection from the set of         candidates. This situation arises in case of uniform image areas         or areas containing a repetitive pattern or texture.

While the problems incurred by an imperfect motion estimation process cannot be cured for the reasons given above, it is an objective of the proposed method to decrease the visibility of those effects in the interpolation result, and thus improve the perceptual quality of the motion compensation. It is another objective of the proposed method to achieve this result with an efficient approach that is suitable for implementation in an integrated circuit. In other words, it is an objective to provide a signal processing means that can decrease the visibility of effects in- curred by imperfect motion estimation in the interpolation result, and thus improve the perceptual quality of the motion compensation, wherein the resources in terms of needed computing time and memory is kept at a minimum.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In order to solve this problem, the present invention provides a method for interpolating a previous and subsequent image of an input image sequence according to claim 1. Further, the present invention provides a signal processing system, a computer program product, a computer readable storage medium and a signal processing means according to claims 20, 21, 22, and 23, respectively. Preferred embodiments of the present invention are defined dependent claims.

The invention provides a method for interpolating a previous and subsequent image of an input image sequence, comprising a step of determining fidelity information for at least one motion vector which is descriptive for motion between, i.e. within, said previous and subsequent image, wherein said fidelity information is descriptive for the level and accuracy of said motion. The level of said motion describes the complexity, magnitude and/or absolute value of said motion. The level of motion therefore can also be seen as the complexity of the motion. Complex motion is defined as non-uniform motion combined with fast occlusion or exposure of depicted moving scene objects. The accuracy of said motion corresponds to the estimated accuracy which can e.g. be derived from the residual error (cf. below). The method further comprises a step of determining classification information for said at least one motion vector, wherein said classification information depends on said fidelity information, wherein said classification information is descriptive for the motion type of said motion. For example, said classification information may be descriptive for the visibility of image blocks in said previous image with respect to said subsequent image or vice versa. The method further comprises a step of selecting an interpolation method in dependence of the determined classification information. This interpolation method is then used to interpolate said previous and subsequent image in order to obtain an interpolated image. For example said previous image may correspond to a time n and said subsequent image corresponds to a time n+1. Then, said interpolated image may correspond to a time n+τ. The time n+τ in this example lies between the time n and n+1. Said fidelity information is useful to decide about the utility, i.e. the usefulness or serviceableness or benefit, of the motion vector for motion compensation within the interpolated image. If e.g. said fidelity information indicates a low fidelity, then the motion vector is considered not to be very useful, whereas when said fidelity information indicates a high fidelity, then this indicates that the corresponding motion vector is useful for compensating motion in said interpolated image.

Thus, an enhancement for a motion compensation system/method is proposed, that identifies problematic image areas containing potential complex motion. The identified areas are then interpolated with an alternative robust method different from the interpolation method used for uniform motion areas to perceptually optimize the interpolation result.

It is possible, that a residual error is determined for each motion vector, and said fidelity information is determined based on said residual error and corresponding motion vector.

It is also possible, that said fidelity information corresponds to 1 Bit of information. In this case the needed amount of memory is very low.

It is also possible, that said fidelity information takes on the value “unstable” if the magnitude of the corresponding motion vector exceeds a first threshold and the corresponding residual error exceeds a second threshold, and otherwise takes on the value “stable”.

It is further possible to additionally perform the following steps:

-   -   projecting said motion vector to an interpolation position         corresponding to an interpolated image which lies between said         previous and subsequent image in order to obtain a projected         motion vector determining said classification information based         on said projected motion vector.

It is further possible to additionally perform the following steps:

-   -   projecting said fidelity information to said interpolation         position in order to obtain projected fidelity information, and     -   determining said classification information based on said         projected fidelity information.

It is also possible that said classification information takes on one of the following motion classification values, each representing a certain motion type:

-   -   “normal”, in which case said motion vector describes unambiguous         motion of an image block that is visible in said previous image         and in said subsequent image,     -   “occlusion”, in which case said motion vector describes motion         of an image block that is visible only in said previous image         and occluded in said subsequent image,     -   “exposure”, in which case said motion vector describes motion of         an image block that is not visible in said previous image and         exposed in said subsequent image,     -   “unknown”, in which case said motion vector describes motion         that cannot be identified as “normal”, “occlusion”, or         “exposure”.

It may be that said classification information is filtered classification information that is determined by filtering unfiltered classification information which is descriptive for the motion type of said motion.

It may also be that said filtering of said unfiltered classification information comprises determining combined fidelity information which depends on said unfiltered classification information, said projected fidelity information and/or said projected motion vector.

It is also possible that said combined fidelity information takes on the value “unstable” if

-   -   said projected fidelity information has the value “unstable” or     -   said projected motion vector corresponds to the null vector         representing no motion and the motion classification value of         said unfiltered classification information is different from         “normal”, or     -   the motion classification value of horizontally and vertically         adjacent motion vectors have the value “unknown” or conflicting         opposite values “occlusion” and “exposure”, and otherwise takes         on the value “stable”.

It is further possible that said combined fidelity information is filtered in order to obtain filtered fidelity information, wherein said filtering of said combined fidelity information comprises a combined morphological dilation and closing operation that enlarges the spatial areas marked with value “unstable”.

Thereby, said filtering of said unfiltered classification information may comprise multiplexing said unfiltered classification information and constant motion classification information having the motion classification value “unknown” in order to obtain multiplexed classification information, wherein said multiplexing is depending on said filtered fidelity information and/or on said combined fidelity information.

Said multiplexed classification information may equal to said unfiltered classification information if said filtered fidelity information has the value “stable” and otherwise be equal to said constant motion classification information.

It is further possible to additionally perform the following steps when filtering said unfiltered classification information:

-   -   determining the motion classification value with majority         occurrence within a spatially defined neighborhood around each         spatial position corresponding to said at least one motion         vector, and     -   setting said filtered classification information to the         determined motion classification value with majority occurrence.

It is further possible to additionally compensate motion based on a filtered motion vector which is determined by:

-   -   selecting a subset of neighbor motion vectors of said projected         motion vector wherein said neighbor motion vectors have a motion         classification value equal to the motion classification value         with majority occurrence, and     -   using said subset of neighbor motion vectors as input to an         adjustment method in order to obtain said filtered motion         vector.

In one embodiment said adjustment method comprises computing the individual averages for the horizontal and vertical motion vector components separately to derive the average horizontal and average vertical motion vector components, and recombining the average vector components to be interpreted as the average motion vector for each neighborhood subset.

In another embodiment said adjustment method comprises computing the individual median values for the horizontal and vertical motion vector components separately to derive the median horizontal and median vertical motion vector components, and recombining the median vector components to be interpreted as median filtered motion vector for each neighborhood subset.

In yet another embodiment said adjustment method comprises enumerating the motion vectors within said subset, in particular by vector magnitude, vector direction or the like, and usage of a rank-order filter to select the representative motion vector for said subset.

It is possible, that said method comprises a step of increasing the resolution after projecting said motion vector and/or said fidelity information.

The signal processing system of the invention is adapted for performing the method or any one of the method steps as defined and explained above.

The computer program product according to the invention comprises computer program means adapted for realizing a method for interpolating a previous and subsequent image of an input image sequence as defined above and/or the steps thereof, when it is executed on a computer, a digital signal processing means, and/or the like.

The computer readable storage medium comprises a computer program product as defined above.

A signal processing means for interpolating a previous and subsequent image of an input image sequence, comprises:

-   -   a fidelity detection unit adapted for determining fidelity         information for at least one motion vector which is descriptive         for motion between said previous and subsequent image, wherein         said fidelity information is descriptive for the level and         accuracy of said motion,     -   a filtering unit adapted for determining classification         information for said at least one motion vector, wherein said         classification information depends on said fidelity information,         said classification information being descriptive for the motion         type of said motion, and     -   an interpolation unit adapted for selecting an interpolation         method in dependence of the determined classification         information.

The signal processing means may also comprise a motion estimation unit adapted for determining a residual error for each motion vector, wherein said fidelity information is determined based on said residual error and corresponding motion vector.

Said signal processing means may also comprise a projection unit adapted for projecting said motion vector to an interpolation position corresponding to an interpolated image which lies between said previous and subsequent image in order to obtain a projected motion vector, wherein said filtering unit is further adapted for determining said classification information based on said projected motion vector.

It is possible that said projection unit is adapted for projecting said fidelity information to said interpolation position in order to obtain projected fidelity information and said filtering unit is adapted for determining said classification information based on said projected fidelity information.

It is possible that said classification information is filtered classification information and said filtering unit is adapted for filtering unfiltered classification information which is descriptive for the motion type of said motion in order to obtain said filtered classification information.

It is further possible that said filtering unit is adapted for determining combined fidelity information which depends on said unfiltered classification information, said projected fidelity information and/or said projected motion vector.

It is also possible that said filtering unit is adapted for filtering said combined fidelity information in order to obtain filtered fidelity information, wherein said filtering of said combined fidelity information comprises a combined morphological dilation and closing operation that enlarges the spatial areas marked with value “unstable”.

Said signal processing means may also comprise a multiplexing unit adapted for multiplexing said unfiltered classification information and constant motion classification information having the motion classification value “unknown” in order to obtain multiplexed classification information, wherein said multiplexing is depending on said filtered fidelity information and/or on said combined fidelity information.

It is possible that said multiplexing unit is controlled such that said multiplexed classification information is equal to said unfiltered classification information if said filtered fidelity information has the value “stable” and otherwise is equal to said constant motion classification information.

Said signal processing means may also comprise an adjustment unit adapted for

-   -   determining the motion classification value with majority         occurrence within a spatially defined neighborhood around each         spatial position corresponding to said at least one motion         vector, and     -   setting said filtered classification information to the         determined motion classification value with majority occurrence.

Said interpolation unit may be adapted for compensating motion based on a filtered motion vector which is determined by said adjustment unit by

-   -   selecting a subset of neighbor motion vectors of said projected         motion vector wherein said neighbor motion vectors have a motion         classification value equal to the motion classification value         with majority occurrence, and     -   using said subset of neighbor motion vectors as input to an         adjustment method in order to obtain said filtered motion         vector.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows a diagram illustrating interpolation of two images where the motion vector could be determined accurately;

FIG. 2 shows a diagram illustrating interpolation of two images where the motion vector could not be determined accurately;

FIG. 3 shows a block diagram with processing units;

FIG. 4 shows an example where the displacement vectors are produced by a forward motion estimation process and the backward vector is derived by inversion of the forward vector;

FIG. 5 shows the basic principle where the forward motion vector field at time index n and the backward motion vector field at time n+1 are both projected to the interpolation position n+τ;

FIG. 6 shows processing units that can be included in the filtering unit PF shown in FIG. 3.

BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

FIG. 3 depicts an embodiment of the motion compensation with improved complex motion processing. The input image sequence SI, consisting of at least two subsequent images, is analyzed by the motion estimation process ME to generate the motion vector signal SV_(M) and corresponding residual error value signal SE_(M) for the transition between the input images at time index n and time index n+1.

The error values SE_(M) are combined by the vector fidelity detector FD with the motion vectors SV_(M) to form a two-valued fidelity indicator SF_(I) that has value “unstable” if the corresponding vector is considered to not accurately representing the motion, or “stable” if the corresponding vector is considered as properly representing the motion.

Both signals SV_(M) and SF_(I) are then shifted spatially by the vector projection process VP in the motion vector field according to the desired temporal position n+τ of the output frame to be interpolated. The vector projection process VP will therefore result in the projected motion vectors SV_(P) and corresponding projected fidelity signal SF_(P). In addition, a four-valued motion classification signal SC_(P) is generated that defines for each motion vector in SV_(P) the corresponding motion type.

The projected motion vectors SV_(P), the corresponding motion type classification SC_(P), and the corresponding projected fidelity indicator SF_(P) are then processed further by the post-filter process PF to generate filtered motion vectors SV_(F) and corresponding filtered motion type classification SC_(F).

The final interpolation process IP generates an output image SO according to the desired temporal position n+τ from at least the source image temporally adjacent at index n and at index n+1 in the source image signal SI. In addition, the filtered motion vector signal SV_(F) and the filtered motion classification SC_(F) are used to perform the interpolation by means of motion compensation.

It is not required for the different motion vector signals depicted in FIG. 3 to have a spatial resolution identical to the resolution of the input and output images. In an embodiment, the resolution of the estimated motion vector field is smaller than the image resolution for efficient implementations of the motion estimation process ME. A typical value is a relation of one vector in the signal SV_(M) for an image block of 8×8 pixels in signal SI. After the vector projection process VP, the resolution can be increased again, e.g. to a relation of one vector in the signal SV_(P) for an image block of 4×4 pixels. The post-filter process PF does usually not create additional resolution, so that the resolution of filtered motion vectors SV_(F) will be identical to projected motion vectors SV_(P).

Details of Fidelity Detection Process FD:

For the proposed improvement of the motion compensation method, a motion vector is always considered to be reliable enough to be included in the process of projecting it to the temporal position n+τ for which an intermediate image should be interpolated. However, each motion vector from the motion estimation process will be graded by means of a fidelity indicator before projecting it to the interpolation position. This has the benefit that only the fidelity indicator requires projection along with the corresponding motion vector, but not the inputs itself used to compute the fidelity indicator.

The fidelity indicator is calculated from basically two signals, the first being the residual error signal of the motion estimation process. This residual error is a separate value associated with each assigned motion vector and reflects the quality of the match. A typical embodiment for a motion estimation process is a block-based approach that minimizes the sum of absolute differences (SAD) between image regions displaced by a candidate motion vector. The residual error signal value is then the SAD value for the motion vector assigned to the respective image position.

A typical characteristic of block-based motion estimation is the reduced accuracy in determining the proper motion vector at the boundary of a foreground object moving over a background object. Usually, the object boundaries are not aligned with the match block grid, so that in those cases only a part of the match block contains pixels from the foreground object for which the motion is desired, while the other part contains non-matching pixels from the background, because the background moves with different motion than the foreground. As a consequence, while a low match error value usually indicates a good motion vector, a high match error value does not automatically indicate a bad motion vector, due to the aforementioned reasons. Therefore, another signal is required for the fidelity indication process.

This other signal can be derived from the general observation that object motion with high velocity results in a blurred object portrayal. This blurring effect is due to the beforehand image acquisition process requiring a minimum exposure time, which results in a temporal integration of all image content moving over a spatial position under observation. For the interior area of moving rigid objects this effect results in an object velocity-dependent but otherwise constant blurriness, while at the border area of moving objects an intermingling with other background objects occurs. This situation is another problem for a block-based motion estimator, i.e. to properly detect the right motion vectors for the foreground and the background objects, because the mixed image areas exist only in one of the previous and next source image, so that a match will fail and a wrong motion vector is detected.

For the above reasoning, the fidelity detector combines the motion vector magnitude derived from motion vector signal SV_(M) with the matching error residual signal SE_(M) to decide about the utility of the motion vector. The value “unstable” is assigned to a spatial position in signal SF_(I), if the corresponding magnitude of the motion vector exceeds a first threshold, and the corresponding error residual exceeds a second threshold. Otherwise, the value “stable” is assigned to the remaining spatial positions in signal SF_(I), which do not meet these conditions.

Details of Motion Vector Projection Process VP:

The objective of the motion vector projection process VP is the positioning of the motion vectors in signal SV_(M) estimated for time index n and n+1 respectively to the desired interpolation position n+τ. This is especially important in case of spatial discontinuities in the motion vector field, i.e. borders between foreground and background objects moving along different trajectories. Otherwise, the interpolation process results in artifacts at the object borders if the motion description of an object does not overlap with its portrayal in the interpolated image. Similar to the transformation of estimated motion vector signal SV_(M) into projected motion vector signal SV_(P), the fidelity indicator signal SF_(I) is transformed into the projected fidelity indicator signal SF_(P).

For similar reasons, it is important to identify the type of motion present at each spatial position in the interpolated frame, so that the subsequent interpolation process selects the most suited interpolation method. Therefore, the motion classification signal SC_(P) is generated, which contains a four-valued motion classification type corresponding to each projected motion vector in signal SV_(P).

The four motion classification types detected by the vector projection process VP are

“normal”: The motion vector describes unambiguous motion of an image block that is visible in both source images, the previous image at time index n and the next image at time index n+1.

“occlusion”: The motion vector describes motion of an image block that is visible only in the previous source image at time index n, but occluded in the next source image at time index n+1.

“exposure”: The motion vector describes motion of an image block that is invisible in the previous source image at time index n, but exposed in the next source image at time index n+1.

“unknown”: The motion vector describes motion that cannot be identified as one of “normal”, “occlusion”, or “exposure” motion types described above.

For the purpose of detecting the correct motion classification type, the motion vector projection process VP requires motion vector information from at least two points in time, at least one before and at least one after the desired interpolation time n+τ.

Several embodiments of motion estimation schemes are adequate for deriving the motion classification type.

One embodiment is described in [2], which employs two parallel but otherwise independent motion estimation processes. The first process estimates the displacements in temporally forward direction from time index n to time index n+1, while the second process estimates the displacements in temporally backward direction from time index n+1 to time index n.

Another embodiment described in [1] performs the motion classification based on a forward motion vector field between time index n and time index n+1 by extrapolating the vectors into time index n−1 and time index n+2 and analyzing the pixel values addressed by these vectors.

In a third embodiment, a single motion estimation process is employed to detect both, forward and backward displacements, from two subsequent motion vector fields. For a motion estimation process, which detects the forward displacements from time index n to time index n+1, the forward motion vectors are used directly. The backward motion vectors are derived then by inverting the forward displacements from time index n+1 to time index n+2. In an alternative embodiment with a motion estimation process, which detects the backward displacements from time index n+1 to time index n, the backward motion vectors are used directly. The forward motion vectors are derived then by inverting the backward displacements from time index n to time index n−1. FIG. 4 depicts an example, where the displacement vectors v_(FO) and v_(F1) are produced by a forward motion estimation process, and the backward vector v_(B1) is derived by inversion of forward vector v_(F1).

The motion classification type can be constructed after establishing the forward displacements from time index n to time index n+1, and the backward displacements from time index n+1 to time index n with the motion estimation scheme of [1] or [2]. FIG. 5 depicts the basic principle, where the forward motion vector field at time index n and the backward motion vector field at time index n+1 are both projected to the interpolation position n+τ. The motion type “normal” is assigned to all spatial positions that contain equivalent matching motion vectors in both of these projections. The motion type “occlusion” is assigned to all spatial positions that contain motion vectors in only the forward vector projection. The motion type “exposure” is assigned to all spatial positions that contain motion vectors in only the backward vector projection. Finally, the motion type “unknown” is assigned to all remaining spatial position that received a motion vector in neither the forward nor the backward projection. In FIG. 5, the motion classification “normal” is assigned to all spatial positions except the sections O and E, where the motion classification “occluded” is assigned to the spatial positions in section O and “exposure” in section E respectively.

Details of Post-Filter Process PF:

The internals of the post-filter process PF will be explained by reference to FIG. 6. In a first step, the projected motion vector signal SV_(P), the projected fidelity signal SF_(P) and the projected motion classification SC_(P) are combined by the fidelity combination process FC to generate the combined fidelity signal SF_(C). The signal SF_(C) is again a binary flag per spatial position with the two values “unstable” and “stable”. The process FC combines any of the following events in a configurable manner for each spatial position in order to assign the value “unstable” for the output fidelity indicator SFC:

-   -   The input fidelity indicator in signal SF_(P) has value         “unstable”.     -   The motion vector in signal SV_(P) is the null vector         representing no motion and the corresponding motion         classification in signal SC_(P) is any but motion type “normal”.     -   The motion types of horizontally and vertically adjacent         positions have value “unknown” or conflicting opposite values         “occlusion” and “exposure”.

Otherwise, the value “stable” is assigned to the output fidelity indicator SF_(C) for all spatial positions, where the above conditions are not met.

In the next step, the fidelity indicator signal SF_(C) is filtered by the process DC to produce the filtered fidelity indicator signal SF_(D). The filtering process DC contains a combined morphological dilation and closing operation that enlarges the spatial areas marked with value “unstable”. This is achieved by first setting all spatial positions adjacent to a position with value “unstable” also to value “unstable” and then filling in a horizontal and vertical manner the value “unstable” between all positions of value “unstable” not more than a configurable distance apart.

The dilated fidelity indicator signal SF_(D) then controls the multiplexer MUX, which selects for each spatial position a value from either the projected motion classification signal SC_(P) or the constant motion classification signal SC_(U). The motion classification signal SC_(U) has the same resolution as the projected motion classification signal SC_(P), but has the motion type value “unknown” assigned to all spatial positions. For each spatial position, the value of the projected motion classification signal SC_(P) is assigned to the output motion classification signal SC_(x) if the fidelity indicator signal SF_(D) has the value “stable” for the corresponding spatial position. Otherwise, the value of the constant motion classification signal SC_(U) is assigned to the output motion classification signal SC_(x) if the fidelity indicator signal SF_(D) has the value “unstable” for the corresponding spatial position.

The projected motion vector signal SV_(P) and the multiplexed motion classification signal SC_(x) are processed further by the motion vector adjustment process VS to produce the filtered motion vector signal SV_(F) and the filtered motion classification signal SC_(F). The filtering process VS first determines the motion classification value with majority occurrence within a spatially defined neighborhood around each spatial position. This majority motion classification is assigned as a result to the filtered motion classification signal SC_(F). The same majority motion classification is also used to select the subset of corresponding neighbor positions in the projected motion vector signal SV_(P). The motion vectors from the neighborhood subset are used as input to an adjustment method to produce a resulting motion vector for each spatial position in the filtered motion vector signal SV_(F). In one embodiment within the adjustment method the individual averages for the horizontal and vertical motion vector components are computed separately to derive the average horizontal and average vertical motion vector components. The average vector components are then recombined to be interpreted as the average motion vector for each neighborhood subset. Another embodiment is to use a rank-order filter (e.g. median filter) instead of an average filter in the procedure described above. Yet another embodiment is to enumerate the motion vectors in the neighborhood subset, e.g. by vector magnitude, vector direction, or other criteria, and then use a rank-order filter to select the representative motion vector for the neighborhood subset.

Details of the Interpolation Process IP:

The interpolation process IP generates an output image SO according to the desired temporal position n+τ from at least two source images, preferably the source image temporally adjacent at time index n and at index n+1 in the source image signal SI. In addition, the filtered motion vector signal SV_(F) and the filtered motion classification SC_(F) are used to perform the interpolation by means of motion compensation.

For each spatial position in the output image SO that is to be interpolated, the corresponding motion classification value is used to select a different interpolation method in effect. Each of those methods on their own are well known individually by prior art.

“normal”: The corresponding motion vector is scaled by factor τ and added to the current spatial position coordinates of the output image to compute the spatial position in the previous input image at time index n, where a first image block is read from. Next, the corresponding motion vector is scaled by factor (τ-1) and added to the current spatial position coordinates of the output image to compute the spatial position in the next input image a time index n+1, where a second image block is read from. The two image blocks are processed by a weighting filter that weights their contribution to the filter result inversely proportional to their temporal distance τ and 1-τ respectively. The filter result is assigned to the current spatial position in the output image SO.

“unknown” : The corresponding motion vector is scaled by factor τ and added to the current spatial position coordinates of the output image to compute the spatial position in the previous input image at time index n, where a first image block is read from. Next, the corresponding motion vector is scaled by factor (τ-1) and added to the current spatial position coordinates of the output image to compute the spatial position in the next input image a time index n+1, where a second image block is read from. A third and a fourth image block are read from the previous and the next input image respectively at the spatial position corresponding to the current spatial position in the output image SO, and then a weighted average of both blocks is assigned to a fifth image block. A rank-order filter selects one of the set of first, second, and fifth image block to be copied to the current spatial position in the output image SO.

“occlusion”: The corresponding motion vector is scaled by factor X and added to the current spatial position coordinates of the output image to compute the spatial position in the previous input image at time index n, where an image block is read from. This image block is copied to the current spatial position in the output image SO.

“exposure”: The corresponding motion vector is scaled by factor (τ-1) and added to the current spatial position coordinates of the output image to compute the spatial position in the next input image a time index n+1, where an image block is read from. This image block is copied to the current spatial position in the output image SO.

In the Following a Brief Summary of Prior Art is Given:

For the motion compensation method presented in [1], the content of four subsequent images is used to determine the correct motion vectors estimated between the two central images, and decide whether image parts are obscured or revealed in the image to be interpolated.

The method proposed in [2] employs two parallel motion estimation processes that result in a forward motion vector field and a corresponding backward motion vector field. The forward and backward motion vectors are compared with an error criterion to decide which vector is used for the image to be interpolated.

In [3], a bi-directional block-based motion estimation process is to used for interlaced-to-progressive as well as for frame rate conversion. The motion estimation employed there delivers one, multiple, or no motion vector for each pixel in the frame to be interpolated. For each of this three cases a distinct interpolation method is used to produce the interpolated output pixels.

The video image upconversion method described in [4] perform detection of the correctness of motion vector to be used for motion compensation of each pixel, and replacing the interpolated pixel value by a previously recorded pixel value if the motion vector is considered incorrect.

The format converter and de-interlacer proposed in [5] uses bi-directional motion estimation between a previous and a next frame. Motion vectors with high match error are replaced by neighboring vectors with locally minimum match error. The resulting vectors are assigned to the interpolation frame, and the frame is interpolated by use of the assigned vectors.

REFERENCES

[1] G. A. Thomas, M. Burl, Video Image Processing, International Patent No. WO 92/05662, Apr. 2, 1992.

[2] G. de Haan, A. Pelagotti, Motion Vector Estimation and Detection of Covered/Uncovered Image Parts, International Patent No. WO 99/22520, May 6, 1999.

[3] D.-J. Wang, J.-J. Leou, A New Approach to Video Format Conversion Using Bidirectional Motion Estimation and Hybrid Error Concealment, Journal of Information Science and Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 763-777, September 2001.

[4] N. Dantwala, Method for Improving Accuracy of Block Based Motion Compensation, International Patent No. WO 02/49365, Jun. 20, 2002.

S.-H. Lee, S.-J. Ko, Format Converter Using Bi-directional Motion Vector and Method Thereof, U.S. Pat. No. 6,900,846, May 31, 2005.

REFERENCE SYMBOLS

FD fidelity detection unit

IP interpolation unit

ME motion estimation unit

MUX multiplexing unit

PF filtering unit

SC_(F) classification information

SC_(P) unfiltered classification information

SC_(U) constant motion classification information

SC_(x) multiplex classification information

SE_(M) residual error

SF_(C) combined fidelity information

SF_(D) filtered fidelity information

SF_(I) fidelity information

SF_(P) projected fidelity information

SI image sequence

SV_(M) motion vector

SV_(P) projected motion vector

VP projection unit

VS adjustment unit 

1-40. (canceled) 41: A method for interpolating a previous and subsequent image of an input image sequence, comprising: determining fidelity information for at least one motion vector that is descriptive for motion between said previous and subsequent image, wherein said fidelity information is descriptive for a level and accuracy of said motion; determining classification information for said at least one motion vector, wherein said classification information depends on said fidelity information, said classification information being descriptive for a motion type of said motion; and selecting an interpolation method in dependence of the determined classification information. 42: A method according to claim 41, wherein a residual error is determined for each motion vector, and said fidelity information is determined based on said residual error and corresponding motion vector. 43: A method according to claim 41, wherein said fidelity information corresponds to 1 Bit of information. 44: A method according to claim 42, wherein said fidelity information takes on the value “unstable” if the magnitude of the corresponding motion vector exceeds a first threshold and the corresponding residual error exceeds a second threshold, and otherwise takes on the value “stable”. 45: A method according to claim 41, further comprising: projecting said motion vector to an interpolation position corresponding to an interpolated image that lies between said previous and subsequent image to obtain a projected motion vector; and determining said classification information based on said projected motion vector. 46: A method according to claim 45, further comprising: projecting said fidelity information to said interpolation position to obtain projected fidelity information; and determining said classification information based on said projected fidelity information. 47: A method according to claim 41, wherein said classification information takes on one of the following motion classification values, each representing a certain motion type: “normal”, in which case said motion vector describes unambiguous motion of an image block that is visible in said previous image and in said subsequent image, “occlusion”, in which case said motion vector describes motion of an image block that is visible only in said previous image and occluded in said subsequent image, “exposure”, in which case said motion vector describes motion of an image block that is not visible in said previous image and exposed in said subsequent image, “unknown”, in which case said motion vector describes motion that cannot be identified as “normal”, “occlusion”, or “exposure”. 48: A method according to claim 41, wherein said classification information is filtered classification information that is determined by filtering unfiltered classification information that is descriptive for the motion type of said motion. 49: A method according to claim 48, wherein said filtering of said unfiltered classification information comprises determining combined fidelity information that depends on said unfiltered classification information, said projected fidelity information, and/or said projected motion vector. 50: A method according to claim 49, wherein said combined fidelity information takes on the value “unstable” if: said projected fidelity information has the value “unstable”, or said projected motion vector corresponds to the null vector representing no motion and the motion classification value of said unfiltered classification information is different from “normal”, or the motion classification value of horizontally and vertically adjacent motion vectors have the value “unknown” or conflicting opposite values “occlusion” and “exposure”, and otherwise takes on the value “stable”. 51: A method according to claim 49, wherein said combined fidelity information is filtered to obtain filtered fidelity information, wherein said filtering of said combined fidelity information comprises a combined morphological dilation and closing operation that enlarges the spatial areas marked with value “unstable”. 52: A method according to claim 49, wherein said filtering of said unfiltered classification information comprises multiplexing said unfiltered classification information and constant motion classification information having the motion classification value “unknown” to obtain multiplexed classification information, wherein said multiplexing is dependent on said filtered fidelity information and/or on said combined fidelity information. 53: A method according to claim 52, wherein said multiplexed classification information is equal to said unfiltered classification information if said filtered fidelity information has the value “stable” and otherwise is equal to said constant motion classification information. 54: A method according to claim 48, wherein said filtering of said unfiltered classification information comprises: determining the motion classification value with majority occurrence within a spatially defined neighborhood around each spatial position corresponding to said at least one motion vector; and setting said filtered classification information to the determined motion classification value with majority occurrence. 55: A method according to claim 54, further comprising: compensating motion based on a filtered motion vector that is determined by: selecting a subset of neighbor motion vectors of said projected motion vector, wherein said neighbor motion vectors have a motion classification value equal to the motion classification value with majority occurrence, and using said subset of neighbor motion vectors as an input to an adjustment method to obtain said filtered motion vector. 56: A method according to claim 55, wherein said adjustment method comprises: computing individual averages for horizontal and vertical motion vector components separately to derive average horizontal and average vertical motion vector components; and recombining the average vector components to be interpreted as the average motion vector for each neighborhood subset. 57: A method according to claim 55, wherein said adjustment method comprises: computing individual median values for horizontal and vertical motion vector components separately to derive median horizontal and median vertical motion vector components; and recombining the median vector components to be interpreted as median filtered motion vector for each neighborhood subset. 58: A method according to claim 55, wherein said adjustment method comprises: enumerating the motion vectors within said subset; and using a rank-order filter to select the representative motion vector for said subset. 59: A method according to claim 41, further comprising: increasing resolution after projecting said motion vector and/or said fidelity information. 60: A signal processing system adapted for performing the method according to claim
 41. 61: A computer program product, comprising: computer program means for realizing a method for interpolating a previous and subsequent image of an input image sequence according to claim 41, when executed on a computer or a digital signal processor. 62: A computer readable storage medium, comprising: a computer program product according to claim
 61. 63: A signal processor interpolating a previous and subsequent image of an input image sequence, comprising: a fidelity detection unit adapted for determining fidelity information for at least one motion vector that is descriptive for motion between said previous and subsequent image, wherein said fidelity information is descriptive for a level and accuracy of said motion; a filtering unit adapted for determining classification information for said at least one motion vector, wherein said classification information depends on said fidelity information, said classification information being descriptive for a motion type of said motion; and an interpolation unit adapted for selecting an interpolation method in dependence of the determined classification information. 64: A signal processor according to claim 63, further comprising: a motion estimation unit adapted for determining a residual error for each motion vector, wherein said fidelity information is determined based on said residual error and corresponding motion vector. 65: A signal processor according to claim 63, wherein said fidelity information corresponds to 1 Bit of information. 66: A signal processor according to claim 64, wherein said fidelity information takes on the value “unstable” if the magnitude of the corresponding motion vector exceeds a first threshold and the corresponding residual error exceeds a second threshold, and otherwise takes on the value “stable”. 67: A signal processor according to claim 63, further comprising: a projection unit adapted for projecting said motion vector to an interpolation position corresponding to an interpolated image that lies between said previous and subsequent image to obtain a projected motion vector, wherein said filtering unit is further adapted for determining said classification information based on said projected motion vector. 68: A signal processor according to claim 67, wherein said projection unit is adapted for projecting said fidelity information to said interpolation position to obtain projected fidelity information and said filtering unit is adapted for determining said classification information based on said projected fidelity information. 69: A signal processor according to claim 63, wherein said classification information takes on one of the following motion classification values, each representing a certain motion type: “normal”, in which case said motion vector describes unambiguous motion of an image block that is visible in said previous image and in said subsequent image, “occlusion”, in which case said motion vector describes motion of an image block that is visible only in said previous image and occluded in said subsequent image, “exposure”, in which case said motion vector describes motion of an image block that is not visible in said previous image and exposed in said subsequent image, “unknown”, in which case said motion vector describes motion that cannot be identified as “normal”, “occlusion”, or “exposure”. 70: A signal processor according to claim 63, wherein said classification information is filtered classification information and said filtering unit is adapted for filtering unfiltered classification information that is descriptive for the motion type of said motion to obtain said filtered classification information. 71: A signal processor according to claim 70, wherein said filtering unit is adapted for determining combined fidelity information that depends on said unfiltered classification information, said projected fidelity information, and/or said projected motion vector. 72: A signal processor according to claim 71, wherein said combined fidelity information takes on the value “unstable” if: said projected fidelity information has the value “unstable”, or said projected motion vector corresponds to the null vector representing no motion and the motion classification value of said unfiltered classification information is different from “normal”, or the motion classification value of horizontally and vertically adjacent motion vectors have the value “unknown” or conflicting opposite values “occlusion” and “exposure”, and otherwise the value “stable”. 73: A signal processor according to claim 71, wherein said filtering unit is adapted for filtering said combined fidelity information to obtain filtered fidelity information, wherein said filtering of said combined fidelity information comprises a combined morphological dilation and closing operation that enlarges the spatial areas marked with the value “unstable”. 74: A signal processor according to claim 71, further comprising: a multiplexing unit adapted for multiplexing said unfiltered classification information and constant motion classification information having the motion classification value “unknown” to obtain multiplexed classification information, wherein said multiplexing is dependent on said filtered fidelity information and/or on said combined fidelity information. 75: A signal processor according to claim 74, wherein said multiplexing unit is controlled such that said multiplexed classification information is equal to said unfiltered classification information if said filtered fidelity information has the value “stable” and otherwise is equal to said constant motion classification information. 76: A signal processor according to claim 71, further comprising: an adjustment unit adapted for: determining the motion classification value with majority occurrence within a spatially defined neighborhood around each spatial position corresponding to said at least one motion vector, and setting said filtered classification information to the determined motion classification value with majority occurrence. 77: A signal processor according to claim 76, wherein said interpolation unit is adapted for compensating motion based on a filtered motion vector that is determined by said adjustment unit by: selecting a subset of neighbor motion vectors of said projected motion vector, wherein said neighbor motion vectors have a motion classification value equal to the motion classification value with majority occurrence, and using said subset of neighbor motion vectors as an input to an adjustment method to obtain said filtered motion vector. 78: A signal processor according to claim 77, wherein said adjustment unit computes individual averages for the horizontal and vertical motion vector components separately to derive average horizontal and average vertical motion vector components, and recombines said average vector components to be interpreted as the average motion vector for each neighborhood subset. 79: A signal processor according to claim 77, wherein said adjustment unit computes individual median values for the horizontal and vertical motion vector components separately to derive median horizontal and median vertical motion vector components, and recombines the median vector components to be interpreted as median filtered motion vector for each neighborhood subset. 80: A signal processor according to claim 77, wherein said adjustment unit enumerates the motion vectors within said subset, and uses a rank-order filter to select the representative motion vector for said subset. 